Mathematics and Philosophy: The universe has no beginning and no Big Bang
Modern physics develops based on the foundation of mathematics and philosophy. Modern physics does not determine itself without mathematics and philosophy. However, new phenomena are observed, but it is considered that they belong to physics to supplement mathematics. In particular, this addition ensures non-contradiction in mathematics. Because according to the incompleteness theorems, a mathematical system to describe reality must be incomplete, to ensure that it will not be contradictory.
Learn more: ‘Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy’ – Scientists Explain The World of Quantum Physics
Learn more: Science Proves That Human Consciousness and Our Material World Are Intertwined: See For Yourself
Literature, philosophy, mathematics and a new quantum theory, proposed that there was no Big Bang.
The Facts: A new physics theory posits that creation comes from the void, which is characterized by non-physical properties. This has been categorized as "ether" by scientists in the past, but today we can actually detect it.
Reflect On: Our two explanations of human creation might be completely false, they could also be true to some extent and blend in together. The big bang doesn't seem to hold much validity as quantum physics advances.
Learn more: ‘Nothing Is Solid & Everything Is Energy’ – Scientists Explain The World of Quantum Physics
Official participation of mathematics in the Big Bang: Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning
Although the Big Bang singularity arises directly and unavoidably from the mathematics of general relativity, some scientists see it as problematic because the math can explain only what happened immediately after—not at or before—the singularity.
---- This is an artist's concept of the metric expansion of space, where space (including hypothetical non-observable portions of the universe) is represented at each time by the circular sections. Note on the left the dramatic expansion (not to scale) occurring in the inflationary epoch, and at the center the expansion acceleration. The scheme is decorated with WMAP images on the left and with the representation of stars at the appropriate level of development. Credit: NASA
"The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there," Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told Phys.org.
Ali and coauthor Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, have shown in a paper published in Physics Letters B that the Big Bang singularity can be resolved by their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end.
Old ideas revisited
The physicists emphasize that their quantum correction terms are not applied ad hoc in an attempt to specifically eliminate the Big Bang singularity. Their work is based on ideas by the theoretical physicist David Bohm, who is also known for his contributions to the philosophy of physics. Starting in the 1950s, Bohm explored replacing classical geodesics (the shortest path between two points on a curved surface) with quantum trajectories.
In their paper, Ali and Das applied these Bohmian trajectories to an equation developed in the 1950s by physicist Amal Kumar Raychaudhuri at Presidency University in Kolkata, India. Raychaudhuri was also Das's teacher when he was an undergraduate student of that institution in the '90s.
Using the quantum-corrected Raychaudhuri equation, Ali and Das derived quantum-corrected Friedmann equations, which describe the expansion and evolution of universe (including the Big Bang) within the context of general relativity. Although it's not a true theory of quantum gravity, the model does contain elements from both quantum theory and general relativity. Ali and Das also expect their results to hold even if and when a full theory of quantum gravity is formulated.
No singularities nor dark stuff
In addition to not predicting a Big Bang singularity, the new model does not predict a "big crunch" singularity, either. In general relativity, one possible fate of the universe is that it starts to shrink until it collapses in on itself in a big crunch and becomes an infinitely dense point once again.
Ali and Das explain in their paper that their model avoids singularities because of a key difference between classical geodesics and Bohmian trajectories. Classical geodesics eventually cross each other, and the points at which they converge are singularities. In contrast, Bohmian trajectories never cross each other, so singularities do not appear in the equations.
In cosmological terms, the scientists explain that the quantum corrections can be thought of as a cosmological constant term (without the need for dark energy) and a radiation term. These terms keep the universe at a finite size, and therefore give it an infinite age. The terms also make predictions that agree closely with current observations of the cosmological constant and density of the universe.
Learn more: Science Proves That Human Consciousness and Our Material World Are Intertwined: See For Yourself
New gravity particle
In physical terms, the model describes the universe as being filled with a quantum fluid. The scientists propose that this fluid might be composed of gravitons—hypothetical massless particles that mediate the force of gravity. If they exist, gravitons are thought to play a key role in a theory of quantum gravity.
In a related paper, Das and another collaborator, Rajat Bhaduri of McMaster University, Canada, have lent further credence to this model. They show that gravitons can form a Bose-Einstein condensate (named after Einstein and another Indian physicist, Satyendranath Bose) at temperatures that were present in the universe at all epochs.
Motivated by the model's potential to resolve the Big Bang singularity and account for dark matter and dark energy, the physicists plan to analyze their model more rigorously in the future. Their future work includes redoing their study while taking into account small inhomogeneous and anisotropic perturbations, but they do not expect small perturbations to significantly affect the results.
"It is satisfying to note that such straightforward corrections can potentially resolve so many issues at once," Das said.
Wait a minute ...
The X variable in this diagram will change your life
Its whole nature is in the diagram
Human life is too short compared to eternity.
So I created a short description drawing and portrayed the essence of X. It will not take much of your time, a short period of time in the infinite time of eternity.
If you have comments on the diagram, please leave a comment to help me, or you can contact via Email: forresttruong@gmail.com, or contact via personal FB: https://www.facebook.com/tao.bit.79
I hope every meaningful and good thing will come to you, at least in the diagram of X.
The X variable in this diagram will change your life
Its whole nature is in the diagram
So I created a short description drawing and portrayed the essence of X. It will not take much of your time, a short period of time in the infinite time of eternity.
If you have comments on the diagram, please leave a comment to help me, or you can contact via Email: forresttruong@gmail.com, or contact via personal FB: https://www.facebook.com/tao.bit.79
I hope every meaningful and good thing will come to you, at least in the diagram of X.
If energy is eternal then what could possibly cause a sudden expanse into everything we see today? That literally makes no sense. Saying God compiled the energies into his own creation and asserting Energy just expanded for no reason are not the same to me 1 sounds more absurd than the other I lean towards God because energy expanding into creation sounds abysmal and how could that be scientifically feasible it makes absolutely 0 sense. It's assumed there was before the big bang WHAT!? How does that make sense It doesn't
ReplyDeleteThese guys know what happened in the first sextillionth second of the universe, meanwhile i dont remember what i had for breakfast this morning
ReplyDeleteYou must have been rejected from a science club...there absolutely is empirical evidence, maybe not of the early universe models exactly, but there is a lot of data unifying the forces we have combined so far. The recent gravitonic observations lend credence to the idea even further.
DeleteMr Hawking says that at the beginning universe had zero size and was infinitely hot.
DeleteIn other words it had no size. How something that have no size (radius = 0) can have infinitely hot temperature? It cant. Big bang idea is delusional.
I'll tell you what's wrong with big bang theory. they should've stopped after season 6. now it just sucks.
ReplyDelete